 |

Useful Educational Links:
Energy Deregulation - What is it
and Why is it Happening?
James M. Grasso, President SilentSherpa ECPS
www.silentsherpa.com
Energy utility services and costs are comprised of three
primary elements:
- Supply Generation (power plant and fuel costs
such as coal, oil, natural gas, nuclear, renewable, etc.),
- Interstate Transmission (high voltage power
lines that run across state lines to substations), and
- Intrastate "Local" Distribution (lower
voltage power lines that run within a utilitys distribution
territory to your business or home).

Energy Deregulation, or "Energy Restructuring"
as it is often referred to in legislative arenas, affords the energy
consumer the ability to purchase the [Supply] Generation component of
their utility service from a third-party competitive supplier
while
the Transmission and Distribution ("T&D") charges remain
monopolized by the local utility and regulated by a state public utility
commission. Although Generation is one of three cost components, it
generally accounts for the majority of the consumers total billed cost
(i.e. 50% - 75% of utility billed cost).
Restructuring laws are passed and administered on a state-by-state basis.
Hence, each state may have different procedures, timelines and levels
of utility participation governing their respective energy market(s).
The one commonality of restructuring legislation is that it requires
an investor owned utility to divest its generation capacity (i.e. sell
off its power plants to non-regulated power producers). The primary
purpose of this activity is to establish free market competition at
the wholesale and retail levels, such that the laws of supply and demand
rule the investment and sales of energy generation rather than federal
or state regulation
hence, "Energy Deregulation." In
doing so, investor owned utilities must purchase or "buy back"
the energy supply the utilities once generated themselves for sale to
their rate payers at a "market based" rate. The purchase and
sale of this power is also open to non-regulated businesses which are
free to market their own "brand" of energy to the utilitys
customer base. These non-regulated businesses are commonly referred
to as "Energy Marketers" and/or "Competitive Suppliers".
So why would an investor-owned utility be willing to give up a monopoly
on energy supply generation? The answer is quite simple, although it
may not be what you think: investor-owned utilities are prohibited by
law from making a profit on energy generation
rather they are afforded
a guaranteed Return On Investment (ROI) on their Transmission and Distribution
capital, operations and maintenance. Hence, the utilities now have the
opportunity to reduce a large amount of overhead, expense, and cash
flow "headaches" and still yield the same cash profit which
translates into an increased ROI for their shareholders (i.e. same profit
allocated over lower operations cost). No, deregulation is not necessarily
about saving the consumer money. Although the laws require consumers
now have choice via competition among supply generators and sellers,
deregulation does not guarantee the consumer will choose the most economic
alternative
thats up to you!
Back to top
|
|
 |